Author Meets Critics: "The Religious Test"

Boisi event image

Damon Linker
Author of聽The Religious Test聽and
Contributing Editor of聽The New Republic

Critics:
Patrick Deneen,
聽Georgetown University
Mark Silk,聽Trinity College

Date:聽November 11, 2010

Read Interview

View Event Flyer

Abstract

In a provocative new book entitled聽The Religious Test: Why We Must Question the Beliefs of Our Leaders, Damon Linker argues that聽certain elements of religious belief鈥攊ncluding radical聽atheism鈥攎ay very well be incompatible with high office, and sometimes even active citizenship, in a democracy. Two expert commentators will critique Linker's argument from different perspectives.

Speaker Bios

Damon Linker

Damon Linker聽is a聽Contributing Editor of聽The New Republic聽and a Senior Writing Fellow in the聽Center for Critical Writing聽at the University of Pennsylvania. He also聽blogs聽about religion, culture, and politics for聽The New Republic. His essays and reviews have appeared in聽The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Commentary, National Review, The Weekly Standard, Policy Review, The Public Interest, The Review of Politics, The Review of Metaphysics, and the聽American Behavioral Scientist. From May 2001 to February 2005, he worked at聽First Things鈥攆irst as associate editor of the journal, then as its editor. Prior to joining the magazine, he taught political philosophy at Brigham Young University and served as a speechwriter for New York鈥檚 Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani. Linker studied history, philosophy, and writing at Ithaca College, graduating with a BA in 1991. He went on to earn an MA in European history from New York University and a Ph.D. in political science from Michigan State University. Born in New York City, Linker currently lives in suburban Philadelphia with聽his wife聽and two children.

Patrick J. Deneen

Patrick J. Deneen聽is聽Associate Professor of Government and holds the Markos and Eleni Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis Chair in Hellenic Studies at Georgetown University. His interests include ancient political thought, American political thought, democratic theory, religion and politics, and literature and politics. He is the author of聽The Odyssey of Political Theory聽(2000) and聽Democratic Faith聽(2005), as well as co-editor of a book entitled聽Democracy's Literature聽(2005). He has also published a number of articles and reviews in such journals as聽Political Theory, Social Research, Polity, Polis, First Things, The Weekly Standard, Perspectives on Political Science, Society, The Hedgehog Review,聽and听颁辞尘尘辞苍飞别补濒. He is currently working on a book examining the concept of the division of labor in Western political thought. Deneen was the recipient of the A.P.S.A.'s Leo Strauss Award for Best Dissertation in Political Philosophy in 1995. Prior to joining the faculty at Georgetown he taught from 1997-2005 at Princeton University, where he held the Laurence S. Rockefeller Preceptorship. From 1995-1997 he was Special Assistant and principal Speechwriter for Joseph Duffey, Director of the United States Information Agency. He has presented work and lectured widely, including at such institutions as University of Maryland, University of Virginia, Berry College, University of Chicago, Colby College, Harvard University, Indiana University, Rutgers University, University of Tulsa, Valparaiso University, and Yale University. In 2006 Deneen became the Founding Director of "The Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy," an initiative that seeks to preserve and extend understanding of America's founding principles and their roots in the Western philosophical and religious

Mark Silk

Mark Silk聽received his A.B. and Ph.D. from Harvard University. After teaching at Harvard in the Department of History and Literature, he became editor of the Boston Review. In 1987 he joined the staff of the聽Atlanta Journal-Constitution, where he worked variously as a reporter, editorial writer and columnist. In 1996 he became the founding director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life at Trinity College and in 1998 founding editor of聽Religion in the News, a magazine published by the Center that examines how the news media handle religious subject matter. In 2005, he was named director of the Trinity College Program on Public Values, comprising both the Greenberg Center and a new Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture. In 2007, he became聽Professor of Religion in Public Life at Trinity College. Professor Silk is the author of聽Spiritual Politics: Religion and America Since World War II听补苍诲听Unsecular Media: Making News of Religion in America. He is co-editor of聽Religion by Region, an eight-volume series on religion and public life in the United States, and co-author of聽The American Establishment and One Nation Divisible: How Regional Religious Differences Shape American Politics. He blogs at "Spiritual Politics" and on聽Beliefnet.com.

Event Photos

Boisi event

Patrick Deneen, Mark Silk, and author, Damon Linker, with Assistant Director Erik Owens.

Boisi event

Mark Silk, Patrick Deneen, Damon Linker, and Erik Owens

Boisi event

Erik Owens

Boisi event

Mark Silk and Patrick Deneen

Boisi event

Mark Silk

Boisi event

Damon Linker

Boisi event

Mark Silk, Patrick Deneen, Damon Linker and Erik Owens

Boisi event

Photos by Kerry Burke, MTS Photography

Event Recap

Our saints will not be statesmen,鈥 began Damon Linker, 鈥淎nd our statesmen will not be saints.鈥 This provocative and perhaps dispiriting claim underlay Linker鈥檚 remarks at our November 11 鈥淎uthor Meets Critics鈥 panel as well as his new book, entitled The Religious Test: Why We Must Question the Beliefs of Our Leaders (W.W. Norton, 2010). Linker is a contributing editor (and frequent blogger on religion, culture and politics) at The New Republic and a senior writing fellow in the Center for Critical Writing at the University of Pennsylvania. He was joined by two critical readers of his book, Patrick Deneen from Georgetown University and Mark Silk of Trinity College in Connecticut. Erik Owens moderated the conversation.

Linker鈥檚 book title refers to the phrase in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, 鈥淣o religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.鈥 In his opening remarks, Linker embraced the constitutional ban on formal religious tests, which he said means that no citizen must belong to any particular religious group or hold any particular religious beliefs in order to be eligible for office and also that no person can be excluded from higher office for the same reasons. The constitutional ban, he said, 鈥渋s a lynchpin, along with the First Amendment, of religious freedom in our country.鈥

Still, Linker argued, the religious beliefs of our political leaders are important to voters because they impact the leaders鈥 decisions and decision-making processes. As a result, an informal religious test properly exists in politics, and Linker鈥檚 goal is to shape its contours by explaining how and why religious beliefs matter in a pluralistic democracy. His book offers six 鈥減olitical commandments鈥 about religion and politics that he believes responsible elected officials should uphold (and responsible voters should seek in their candidates). They include admonitions to embrace religious freedom for all, put the Constitution above other authorities, honor scientific knowledge, be humble about knowing God鈥檚 will, disclaim consensus on sexual issues, and reject intolerance couched in radical atheism.

Critic Patrick Deneen, associate professor of government and the Markos and Eleni Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis Professor of Hellenic Studies at Georgetown, welcomed the call to take the religious beliefs of our leaders seriously. But he argued that Linker鈥檚 political commandments would necessarily apply to all citizens, not just candidates or elected leaders, and would therefore reduce the religious freedom he claimed to seek. Focusing his remarks on Linker鈥檚 conception of liberal society, Deneen bemoaned the exclusion of religious conservatives from the center of politics at a time when their values of community, fidelity and faith are needed to counteract the widespread moral indifference of political liberals.

Mark Silk, professor of religion in public life and director of the Greenberg Center for Religion in Public Life at Trinity College, also supported the premise that voters should question candidates鈥 religious beliefs. He worried, though, how the political commandments would be employed in practice and whether the exercise would be fruitful for political discourse.

Linker responded to both critics by clarifying his earlier portrait of liberal society and describing in more depth the contexts in which his own religious test should be employed. Audience members leavened the discussion with a number of excellent questions before time drew the lively discussion to a close.

Read More

Further Reading

Damon Linker,聽聽(W.W. Norton 2010)

In this provocative, hard-hitting manifesto, Damon Linker exhorts both believers and atheists to behave better in the public sphere, and offers a carefully charted roadmap for doing so. 聽聽

听听听听

Op-Ed "."听The Washington Post, September 19, 2010.

In this Op-Ed, Linker argues that, since the rise of the religious right in the late 1970s, citizens have become more inclined to question of the political implications of presidential candidates' religious beliefs. 聽

"."听The New Republic, September 30, 2010.

Here Linker discusses the tension between religion and politics and his theory that, "as long as the United States remains a liberal nation with a centerless society, traditionalist religion at its peak will fail to harmonize with politics at its peak."

"."听The Utopian, September 20, 2010.

In this article, Linker traces the evolution of American sexual morality in order to highlight the difficulties of attaining consensus in today's political society.

"."听The Economist, October 13, 2010.

In this interview, Democracy in America poses six questions to Damon Linker regarding "religion's virtue, the "theocons", atheists and social conservatives."

"" by Mark Silk, beliefnet, October 11, 2010.

In his blog entitled,聽Religion and Public Life, Mark Silk discusses the recent denouncements of same-sex marriage by political candidates, including GOP candidate for governor of New York, Carl Paladino, and religious leaders, who cite religious justifications for their objections.

"," by Patrick Deneen,聽What I Saw in America, November 11, 2010.

This post from Patrick Deneen's blog entitled,聽What I Saw in America,聽summarizes his comments from the聽Author Meets Critics: "The Religious Test"聽event held by the Boisi Center on November 11, 2010.听

"," by Chris Canniff,聽The Observer,聽November 16, 2010.

This article provides a nice summary of the panel discussion of Damon Linker's new book,聽The Religious Test,聽hosted by the Boisi Center at Boston College on November 11, 2010.

," by Patrick J. Deneen,聽The Washington Post, Nov. 15th, 2010.

In this article, Deneen critiques Linker's argument that religious conservatives have contributed to the "skirmish" between religion and politics. 聽Instead, Deneen posits that "modern economic conservatism and modern identity liberalism have combined in the support of titanic inequalities in our society" and that America must return to the religious roots and values upon which our Republic was founded.

Blogs by the Panel Participants

"What I Saw in America: The Political Theory of Daily Life." See especially the November 8th entry "In Beantown!" Deneen also writes for the聽

, "Spiritual Politics: A Blog on Religion and American Political Culture"

聽for The New Republic. He also聽聽of events, articles and more.

Videos by the Panel Participants

At an聽聽hosted by Mark Crispin Miller, Damon Linker and Jeff Sharlet discuss the role of religion in politics and Linker's new book,聽The Religious Test: Why We Must Question the Beliefs of Our Leaders.听

In the News


by聽Damon Linker聽9.30.10
The New Republic

In聽this recent article Linker聽writes, "as long as the United States remains a liberal nation with a centerless society, traditionalist religion at its peak will fail to harmonize with politics at its peak."